Skip to main content
Back to Top

 

Do local economic development programs work? Evidence from the Federal Empowerment Zone Program

Date Added to Library: 
Friday, January 4, 2013 - 11:07
Priority: 
normal
Individual Author: 
Busso, Matias
Kline, Patrick
Reference Type: 
Place Published: 
New Haven, Connecticut
Published Date: 
February 2008
Published Date (Text): 
February 2008
Publication: 
Yale Economics Department Working Paper
Issue Number: 
36
Year: 
2008
Language(s): 
Abstract: 

This paper evaluates Round I of the federal urban Empowerment Zone (EZ) program, which constitutes one of the largest standardized federal interventions in impoverished urban American neighborhoods since President Johnson’s Model Cities program. The EZ program is a series of spatially targeted tax incentives and block grants designed to encourage economic, physical, and social investment in the neediest urban and rural areas in the United States. We use four decades of Census data on urban neighborhoods in conjunction with information on the proposed boundaries of rejected EZs to assess the impact of Round I EZ designation on local labor and housing market outcomes over the period 1994-2000. Utilizing a semi-parametric difference-in-differences estimator we find that neighborhoods receiving EZ designation experienced moderate improvements in labor market conditions and sizeable increases in owner-occupied housing values and rents relative to rejected and future Empowerment Zones. These effects were accompanied by small changes in the demographic composition of the neighborhoods, suggesting that some, though not all, of the observed improvements in EZ neighborhoods are the result of neighborhood churning. No evidence exists of large scale gentrification, indicating that many of the benefits (and costs) of the program have been captured by pre-existing residents. (author abstract)

This resource was also published as a working paper by the National Poverty Center at the University of Michigan.

Geographic Focus: 
Page Count: 
59
Research Notes: 
Both Nonexperimental and quasi-experimental. first part of the analysis is looking at the impact of EZ designation; then they use a quasi-control group to compare how those outcomes (RF and CW 1.25.13)
Share/Save

The SSRC is here to help you! Do you need more information on this record?

If you are unable to access the full-text of the article from the Public URL provided, please email our Librarians for assistance at ssrc@selfsufficiencyresearch.org.

In addition to the information on this record provided by the SSRC, you may be able to use the following options to find an electronic copy from an online subscription service or your local library:

  • Worldcat to find an electronic copy from an online subscription service
  • Google Scholar to discover other full text options